Continued HER2 Suppression With Lapatinib Plus Trastuzumab Versus Trastuzumab Alone

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

This was a randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab versus trastuzumab alone as continued HER2 suppression therapy in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eligible subjects should have completed 12 to 24 weeks of first- or second-line treatment with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, experienced either complete disappearance of all metastatic lesions, or persistence of metastatic disease (stable disease) without unequivocal progression or the occurrence of new lesions, and been indicated to continue to receive trastuzumab alone as maintenance therapy. Eligible subjects who entered the LPT112515 study on first-line treatment should not have known history of central nervous system (CNS) metastases; subjects who entered the study on second-line treatment should not have known history of CNS metastases or have stable (asymptomatic and off steroids ≥3 months) CNS metastases. The primary objective of this study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) in subjects with HER2-positive MBC randomized to receive treatment with lapatinib plus trastuzumab versus those randomized to receive trastuzumab alone. The secondary objectives included overall survival, clinical benefit response rate (CR, PR or SD ≥24 weeks) and the qualitative and quantitative adverse event profile of the 2 treatment arms. It was estimated that 280 subjects (140 per group) would be required to observe 193 PFS events.

About this trial record page

What this page shows

Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00968968, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.

What this page does not do

No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.

Where the data comes from

Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.

Last refresh

Last update posted Jun 10, 2019 · Synced Oct 21, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.