Effectiveness of an Opioid Sparing Pain Regimen in Cardiac Surgery
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03679013. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
A Pilot Study Comparing the Effectiveness of an Opioid- Sparing Analgesic Regimen and an Opioid Based Regimen on Post- Operative Pain Control in Cardiac Surgery Patients (INOVA OPIOID
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
The Inova Heart and Vascular Institute (IHVI) perform over 300 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries per year. While opioid medications are the institutional standard of care for post-operative pain therapy little is known about the variation in pain scores, incidence of post- operative complications, and cost of hospitalization when an alternative multimodal pain regimen consisting of oral Gabapentin and intravenous Acetaminophen (IV APAP) is utilized. The objective is to determine whether there is a substantial difference in pain scores, incidence of post-operative complications, and costs associated with hospitalization when a non-opioid multimodal pain regimen is utilized A single- center, open label, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comprised of 20 total patients who have undergone isolated CABG at the IHVI will be conducted. Separate cohorts will include patients receiving opioid medications post-operatively (Group 1) and patients receiving the non-opioid regimen of oral Gabapentin and IV APAP (Group 2) to be followed for 72 hours post CABG surgery. Main outcome measures include pain scores in both study groups, requests for breakthrough pain medication in both groups, gastrointestinal and respiratory complications of ileus and reduction in tidal volumes or forced vital capacity (FVC) at baseline and at 72 hours,increase in serum AST/ALT, and comparison of cost of hospitalization between groups. The objective of this pilot study is to provide evidence that multimodal pain therapy utilizing IV APAP and PO Gabapentin will provide more effective pain relief than standard of care opioids as evidenced by pain scores \<2. And the reduced consumption of opioids will lead to a reduction in ileus, no increase in AST/ALT, post-operative tidal volumes as assessed by incentive spirometry comparable to pre- surgical values, while also showing a positive effect on the cost of hospitalization.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT03679013
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 19 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Interventions
Drug
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 85 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Apr 18, 2019
- Primary completion
- Jul 11, 2019
- Completion
- Jul 11, 2019
- Last update posted
- Nov 7, 2022
2019
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inova Heart and Vascular institute | Falls Church | Virginia | 22042 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03679013, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Nov 7, 2022 · Synced Sep 3, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT03679013 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.