Efficacy Study of Pioglitazone Compared to Glimepiride on Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease Progression in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00225277. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing the Effects of Pioglitazone HCl Versus Glimepiride on the Rate of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), compared to glimepiride on atherosclerotic disease measured by intravascular ultrasound.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT00225277
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 547 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 35 Years to 85 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Jul 2003 (Type not available)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007 (Actual)
- Completion
- Oct 2007 (Actual)
- Last update posted
- Feb 28, 2012
2003 – 2007
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 65
- U.S. states
- 29
- U.S. cities
- 65
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not listed | Birmingham | Alabama | — | — |
| Not listed | Phoenix | Arizona | — | — |
| Not listed | Huntington Beach | California | — | — |
| Not listed | Los Angeles | California | — | — |
| Not listed | Sacramento | California | — | — |
| Not listed | San Diego | California | — | — |
| Not listed | Torrance | California | — | — |
| Not listed | Bridgeport | Connecticut | — | — |
| Not listed | Farmington | Connecticut | — | — |
| Not listed | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | — | — |
| Not listed | Bay Pines | Florida | — | — |
| Not listed | Jacksonville | Florida | — | — |
| Not listed | Decatur | Georgia | — | — |
| Not listed | Boise | Idaho | — | — |
| Not listed | Chicago | Illinois | — | — |
| Not listed | Edgewood | Kentucky | — | — |
| Not listed | Lexington | Kentucky | — | — |
| Not listed | Louisville | Kentucky | — | — |
| Not listed | New Orleans | Louisiana | — | — |
| Not listed | Bangor | Maine | — | — |
| Not listed | Baltimore | Maryland | — | — |
| Not listed | Detroit | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Flint | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Kalamazoo | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Petoskey | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Pontiac | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Royal Oak | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Ypsilanti | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Duluth | Minnesota | — | — |
| Not listed | Minneapolis | Minnesota | — | — |
| Not listed | Saint Cloud | Minnesota | — | — |
| Not listed | Columbia | Missouri | — | — |
| Not listed | Camden | New Jersey | — | — |
| Not listed | Albany | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | Mineola | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | New York | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | Rochester | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | The Bronx | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | Troy | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | West Islip | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | Williamsville | New York | — | — |
| Not listed | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | — | — |
| Not listed | Cincinnati | Ohio | — | — |
| Not listed | Cleveland | Ohio | — | — |
| Not listed | Columbus | Ohio | — | — |
| Not listed | Westlake | Ohio | — | — |
| Not listed | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | — | — |
| Not listed | Tulsa | Oklahoma | — | — |
| Not listed | Abington | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Bryn Mawr | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Hershey | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Providence | Rhode Island | — | — |
| Not listed | Greenville | South Carolina | — | — |
| Not listed | Memphis | Tennessee | — | — |
| Not listed | Oak Ridge | Tennessee | — | — |
| Not listed | Amarillo | Texas | — | — |
| Not listed | Houston | Texas | — | — |
| Not listed | Lubbock | Texas | — | — |
| Not listed | San Antonio | Texas | — | — |
| Not listed | Charlottesville | Virginia | — | — |
| Not listed | Norfolk | Virginia | — | — |
| Not listed | Richmond | Virginia | — | — |
| Not listed | Everett | Washington | — | — |
| Not listed | Green Bay | Wisconsin | — | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
Non-U.S. locations
This page focuses on the U.S. directory. The official record also lists 14 non-U.S. sites.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00225277, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Feb 28, 2012 · Synced Oct 24, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete public registry record, listed eligibility criteria, and available contact information for NCT00225277 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.