Endovenous Ablation With and Without Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01197833. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Study of Endovenous Thermal Ablation With or Without Varisolve™ Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different doses of an investigational drug, Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) compared to vehicle (inactive solution) when used following an approved heat treatment in subjects with varicose veins.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT01197833
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 117 participants
Conditions and interventions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 75 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Sep 2010 (Type not available)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2012 (Actual)
- Completion
- Dec 2012 (Actual)
- Last update posted
- Apr 21, 2021
2010 – 2012
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 7
- U.S. states
- 6
- U.S. cities
- 7
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not listed | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85255 | — |
| Not listed | Bradenton | Florida | 34209 | — |
| Not listed | Oak Brook | Illinois | 60523 | — |
| Not listed | North Tonawanda | New York | 14120 | — |
| Not listed | Stony Brook | New York | 11974 | — |
| Not listed | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28207 | — |
| Not listed | Kirkland | Washington | 98034 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01197833, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Apr 21, 2021 · Synced Oct 23, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete public registry record, listed eligibility criteria, and available contact information for NCT01197833 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.