Independent directory Public ClinicalTrials.gov records United States
ClinicalTrials.gov record
Terminated Not applicable Interventional Results available

Rehabilitation With or Without Static Progressive Splinting for Wrist Stiffness

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01618227

Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01618227. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.

ClinicalTrials.gov public records Last synced Sep 5, 2026, 9:17 PM EDT

Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.

Official title

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Rehabilitation With or Without Static Progressive Splinting for Wrist Stiffness

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

Loss of wrist flexion and extension is a common problem after wrist and forearm fractures that may lead to disability and unsatisfactory outcomes after fracture treatment. In many patients, this range of motion loss is caused by stiffness of the soft tissues. Such stiffness may loosen up and improve with rehabilitation. Static progressive splints apply a constant stretch upon the wrist resulting in a stretch relaxation and plastic deformation of the soft tissues. By altering the splint's bending angle, one can incrementally increase the force applied on either wrist flexion or extension. There are no data comparing rehabilitation with static-progressive splinting to rehabilitation without static-progressive splinting for the restoration of wrist flexion and extension after wrist or forearm fractures. Primary study hypothesis: Two months after study enrollment patients that use static progressive splinting have better wrist flexion and extension than patients that use standard therapy techniques. Secondary study hypotheses: 1. Six months after study enrollment, subjects that use static progressive splinting have better wrist flexion and extension than those that use standard therapy techniques. 2. Motion at enrollment, 2 months and 6 months after enrollment correlates with negative pain thoughts, pain anxiety, and depression. 3. Six months after study enrollment, subjects that use static progressive splinting have had fewer physical/occupational therapy visits than those that use standard therapy techniques. 4. Six months after study enrollment patients that use static progressive splinting have had fewer additional surgeries than patients that use standard therapy techniques. This study will employ a prospective randomized design. Subjects will be invited to enroll during their routine office follow-up visit. Informed consent will be obtained. Subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to rehabilitation with or without static progressive splinting. All subjects will have a standard rehabilitation program including physical or occupational therapy and home exercises throughout the study. The static progressive splint will be prescribed according to the randomization sequence. Upon receipt of the splint, subjects will be instructed in proper application and use by their treating therapist or a representative of the company. Subjects will be instructed to follow the daily splint wearing protocol provided by the device manufacturer. Use of the splints will be discontinued at the patient's discretion or when a plateau phase in active range of motion is achieved (defined as no measurable gains in active range of motion achieved in a 30-day period).

Study identification

NCT ID
NCT01618227
Recruitment status
Terminated
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Enrollment
4 participants

Conditions and interventions

Eligibility (public fields only)

Age range
18 Years and older
Sex
All
Healthy volunteers
Healthy volunteers not accepted

This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Study timeline

Start date
Aug 31, 2008
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2014
Completion
Dec 31, 2014
Last update posted
Mar 22, 2017

2008 – 2015

United States locations

U.S. sites
1
U.S. states
1
U.S. cities
1
Facility City State ZIP Site status
Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts 02114

Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.

About this trial record page

What this page shows
Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01618227, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
What this page does not do
No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
Where the data comes from
Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
Last refresh
Last update posted Mar 22, 2017 · Synced Sep 5, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.

Open the official record

The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT01618227 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View official ClinicalTrials.gov record →