Heated High Flow Oxygen Use in Infants With Bronchiolitis and Hypoxia
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01662544. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Comparison of Heated Humidified High-flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC) Versus Standard Nasal Cannula Oxygen Delivery on Respiratory Distress and Length of Stay in Infants With Bronchiolitis and Hypoxia
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Bronchiolitis is a common cold weather seasonal respiratory illness affecting infants and children. Multiple supportive therapies have been tried in infants with bronchiolitis including albuterol, racemic epinephrine, hypertonic saline nebulization, but to date supportive therapy with oxygen is the only proven therapy to decrease respiratory distress in infants with bronchiolitis, with hypertonic saline showing a borderline statistically significant improvement. This prospective, randomized study will compare CSS and PEWS scores on infants who receive oxygen by standard flow nasal cannula and to those who receive oxygen via Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC). The results will help determine if infants with viral bronchiolitis who receive humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy have improved Clinical Severity Score (CSS) and Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) scores and ultimately decreased lengths of admissions when compared to patients treated with nasal cannula oxygen therapy with/without bronchodilator therapy. Hypothesis Heated Humidified High-flow Nasal Cannula Delivery of Oxygen decreases respiratory distress as measured by pediatric CSS and PEWS when compared with routine nasal cannula oxygen delivery in infants with bronchiolitis.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT01662544
- Recruitment status
- Not listed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 56 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 3 Months to 18 Months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 30, 2015
- Completion
- Nov 30, 2017
- Last update posted
- Jul 18, 2017
2012 – 2017
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55404 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01662544, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Jul 18, 2017 · Synced Sep 6, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT01662544 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.