Durolane Versus Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) in Knee Osteoarthritis
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01753830. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
A Multi Center, Randomized, Double Blind, Saline Controlled Study of a Single Injection of Durolane® Versus a Single Injection of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) to Treat Pain Associated With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether a single intra-articular injection of Durolane 4.5 mL is superior to a single injection of PBS 4.5 mL for the relief of joint pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT01753830
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 75 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 40 Years to 80 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Dec 2012 (Type not available)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (Actual)
- Completion
- Feb 2014 (Actual)
- Last update posted
- Aug 26, 2022
2012 – 2014
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 25
- U.S. states
- 17
- U.S. cities
- 25
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not listed | Anniston | Alabama | — | — |
| Not listed | Mobile | Alabama | — | — |
| Not listed | Phoenix | Arizona | — | — |
| Not listed | Tucson | Arizona | — | — |
| Not listed | Hot Springs | Arkansas | — | — |
| Not listed | Beverly Hills | California | — | — |
| Not listed | El Cajon | California | — | — |
| Not listed | Boulder | Colorado | — | — |
| Not listed | Danbury | Connecticut | — | — |
| Not listed | Trumbull | Connecticut | — | — |
| Not listed | Lauderdale Lakes | Florida | — | — |
| Not listed | Pinellas Park | Florida | — | — |
| Not listed | South Miami | Florida | — | — |
| Not listed | Boise | Idaho | — | — |
| Not listed | Meridian | Idaho | — | — |
| Not listed | Evansville | Indiana | — | — |
| Not listed | New Orleans | Louisiana | — | — |
| Not listed | Wheaton | Maryland | — | — |
| Not listed | Kalamazoo | Michigan | — | — |
| Not listed | Springfield | Missouri | — | — |
| Not listed | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | — | — |
| Not listed | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | — | — |
| Not listed | Charleston | South Carolina | — | — |
| Not listed | Norfolk | Virginia | — | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01753830, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Aug 26, 2022 · Synced Oct 20, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete public registry record, listed eligibility criteria, and available contact information for NCT01753830 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.