Methadone vs Magnesium in Spinal Fusion
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01795495. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Analgesia Following Posterior Spinal Fusion: Methadone vs Magnesium
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Significant pain may occur following posterior spinal fusion despite the use of conventionally accepted techniques including patient controlled analgesia. If detected, a significant reduction in opioid requirements may lead to improved patient satisfaction and decreased opiate side effects. The current study would use a prospective, randomized trial investigating the efficacy of one of 2 regimens as adjuncts to intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, along with a third control group. The patients would be randomized to receive remifentanil plus a single intraoperative dose of methadone; remifentanil plus a bolus followed by an infusion of magnesium; or remifentanil alone. In addition, the two medications being studied might make it easier to determine the efficacy of neurophysiologic monitoring including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) (amplitude and latency) and motor evoked potential (MEP) (mA) required to elicit the response. The purpose of this study would be to explore the effects of intraoperative methadone vs magnesium on intraoperative anesthetic requirements, postoperative opioid requirements, the efficacy of neurophysiologic monitoring including SSEP and MEP, inspired concentration of desflurane, remifentanil, and the need for intraoperative supplemental agents to control blood pressure.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT01795495
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 63 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 12 Years to 19 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Aug 31, 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 31, 2016
- Completion
- Aug 31, 2016
- Last update posted
- Feb 7, 2018
2013 – 2016
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide Children's Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | 43205 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
Recently updated Idiopathic Scoliosis trials
Other public records listing Idiopathic Scoliosis. Sorted by last update posted; newest first. Not a recommendation.
- NCT07734467: Immune Response to PSF in Idiopathic vs Neuromuscular Scoliosis Not yet recruiting
- NCT07574632: A Study to Evaluate a New Semi-rigid Brace, the RESILIENT Brace by Thinks Works, as a Way to Limit Curve Worsening in Kids With Idiopathic Scoliosis. Recruiting
- NCT07589023: A Retrospective Review: Outcomes of the REFLECT™ System for Idiopathic Scoliosis Not yet recruiting
- NCT06626503: Evaluation of Analgesia for Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children Recruiting
- NCT05071144: Advanced SPinal Innovations With Robotics and Enabling Technology Registry Recruiting
- NCT06298812: REFLECT Scoliosis System Post Approval Study Recruiting
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01795495, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Feb 7, 2018 · Synced Sep 13, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT01795495 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.