Independent directory Public ClinicalTrials.gov records United States
ClinicalTrials.gov record
Completed No phase listed Observational

Clinical Application of "Train of Four" Testing in the Intraoperative Monitoring Setting

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01932983

Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01932983. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.

ClinicalTrials.gov public records Last synced Sep 6, 2026, 12:36 AM EDT

Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.

Official title

Clinical Application of Train of Four Testing in the Intraoperative Monitoring Setting

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

The study examines the clinical application of TOF (train of four test) used by anesthesiologists and neurophysiologists during instrumented spine procedures, as well as certain associated parameters. 'Train of four' test is a test routinely used during the surgery, which is performed by stimulation of peripheral nerve with purpose to determine the degree of muscle relaxation by interpretation of muscle response. During spine surgery, it is helpful for the surgeon to have a patient's muscles as relaxed as possible with the least amount of tone, especially when exposing. Anesthesiologists achieve this level of relaxation by giving a neuromuscular blocking agent. If medication given to do this has not fully left their system by the time the surgeon needs to start putting in the screws and rods, then the intraoperative monitoring can not be adequately performed. If the muscles are too relaxed, then free run EMG and screw stimulation, two monitoring methods used, will not be analyzed correctly and the surgery may be adversely affected. This study compares the results of the 'train of four' test performed by neurophysiologists and anesthesiologists. Additionally, it looks at the differences, if any, in comparing stimulation of the foot nerve (tibial n.) or hand nerve (ulnar n.) Performing the TOF (train of four test) in the lower extremity can be relevant for many reasons. Train of four tests can show the presence of four twitches in the arms but the legs may not fully recovered from muscle relaxant given by anesthesia. Also, train of four test which uses subjective method of interpretation by anesthesiologists may present different results compared than objective quantitative method of train of four test interpretation. Ultimately, the goal of this study is to show the importance of 'TOF' testing in ensuring that any identifiable preventable intraoperative surgical complication is appropriately identified.

Study identification

NCT ID
NCT01932983
Recruitment status
Completed
Study type
Observational
Phase
Not listed
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Other
Enrollment
150 participants

Conditions and interventions

Eligibility (public fields only)

Age range
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
Healthy volunteers
Healthy volunteers not accepted

This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Study timeline

Start date
Mar 31, 2012
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2013
Completion
Mar 31, 2013
Last update posted
Oct 26, 2015

2012 – 2013

United States locations

U.S. sites
1
U.S. states
1
U.S. cities
1
Facility City State ZIP Site status
NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases New York New York 10003

Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.

About this trial record page

What this page shows
Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01932983, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
What this page does not do
No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
Where the data comes from
Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
Last refresh
Last update posted Oct 26, 2015 · Synced Sep 6, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.

Open the official record

The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT01932983 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View official ClinicalTrials.gov record →