Comparing Implant Stability Using Two Accepted Techniques for Implant Sites
Open the official record
This page only displays public information reproduced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02096978. It adds no medical advice, opinions, or eligibility judgments. The official record remains the source of truth for eligibility criteria, enrollment, and contact information.
All trial information on this site comes from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API (clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2), run by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. We only display that public information; we do not add opinions, endorsements, or any other intent. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing Implant Stability Using Osteotome vs. Conventional Drilling Techniques by Resonance Frequency Analysis
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
The study will be conducted to compare two alternative techniques for dental implant placement. Both of the techniques - Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for the preparation of the implant sites (osteotomies) are accepted standards of care. The goal of the study will be to compare implant stabilities achieved with two techniques by measuring resonance frequency for each implant placed using the diagnostic device, the Osstell machine, that measures "stiffness" of the bone/implant system non-invasively. The data are represented in a quantitative value - implant stability quotient (ISQ), where a higher value indicated a higher implant stability. Since it has been well documented in the scientific literature that primary (at the time of implant placement) implant stability is a strong prerequisite for implant success (osseointegration and subsequent function on loading), the results of this study will guide the implant team in choosing the right surgical treatment protocol - the protocol that will be aimed for higher implant stability, and, therefore, for higher long-term implant success.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT02096978
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 17 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 65 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepts healthy volunteers
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Oct 2010 (Type not available)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (Actual)
- Completion
- Apr 2013 (Actual)
- Last update posted
- Mar 26, 2014
2010 – 2013
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers School of Dental Medicine | Newark | New Jersey | 07101 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02096978, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Mar 26, 2014 · Synced Nov 15, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.