PReoperative Identification Of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

Rationale: For resectable esophageal cancer the standard therapy is 5 weeks of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery 6-8 weeks afterwards. Surgery is performed independent of the response to nCRT and is associated with substantial morbidity. A pathological complete response (pCR) after nCRT is seen in 28-34% of patients. Pathological non-responders (pNR) most probably do not benefit from nCRT but are exposed to its toxicity and delay from surgical therapy inevitably occurs in this group. Early identification of non-responders during nCRT would allow individualized decision making in continuation or discontinuation of nCRT. Furthermore, a tool is desirable to accurately assess the treatment response after nCRT to identify patients with a complete response. Studies in rectal cancer reported that tumor resection could be omitted in patients with persisting clinical complete response after 12 months. Also, in some esophageal cancer studies, complete responders in surgical and non-surgical treatment groups had comparable overall survival. These findings indicate the possibility to perform nCRT as sole treatment in patients with a complete response. Conversely, if residual tumor is demonstrated, this will support the decision to move to surgery. Objective: Diagnostic study to assess the distinct and combined value of anatomical and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in the evaluation of treatment response to nCRT for patients with esophageal cancer. Study design: Multi-center diagnostic study investigating the value of MRI and PET-CT in the imaging before, during and after nCRT for assessment of response to nCRT for resectable esophageal cancer. Imaging response measurements will be compared with the histopathological tumor regression grade (TRG) of the resection specimen as gold standard. Study population: 50 patients (\>18 years) presenting at the UMC Utrecht or M.D. Anderson Cancer Center with resectable esophageal cancer, as determined by endoscopy and biopsy, computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), receiving nCRT prior to surgery. Procedure: In addition to the conventional diagnostic work-up for esophageal cancer including a standard PET-CT before nCRT, two PET-CT scans will be performed during and after nCRT as well as three MRI scans before, during and after nCRT at the same time points. The first MRI (and standard-of-care PET-CT) scan session will be within the 6 weeks prior to the start of nCRT. The second scan session will take place after 10-14 days after the start of nCRT. The third and final scan session will be planned 1-2 weeks before surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Determination of the distinct and combined diagnostic value of anatomical and functional MRI and PET-CT in the evaluation of treatment response to nCRT for patients with esophageal cancer. Important imaging parameters include apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, standardized uptake values (SUV) and volume measurements for the different time points. The differences of these values between time points are of particular interest (delta-ADC, delta-SUV, delta-volume). The sensitivity (%), specificity (%), negative predictive value (%), positive predictive value (%), and accuracy (%) of the different imaging parameters for correctly identifying histopathological complete response will be calculated.

About this trial record page

What this page shows

Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02125448, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.

What this page does not do

No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.

Where the data comes from

Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.

Last refresh

Last update posted Nov 15, 2020 · Synced Sep 5, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.