Impact of Therapy Dog Presence on Pediatric Echocardiogram

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

Young children with known or suspected heart disease frequently have difficulty cooperating with a clinically ordered echocardiogram. Current distraction techniques vary in efficacy. There have been no studies examining the use of animal assisted therapy to improve echocardiogram quality and completeness, as well as the patient/parent experience. Hypotheses: 1. The presence and interaction of therapy dogs with young children undergoing echocardiography in a clinical setting will result in more complete and higher quality echocardiograms compared to standard distraction techniques. 2. Parents will report higher visit satisfaction scores and greater exam comfort for their children for echocardiograms performed with the aid of canine assisted therapy compared to use of standard distraction techniques. Study Activities and Population Group: Pilot Phase: Introduction of trained therapy dogs (approved by the Pets at Duke Therapy Program) for 10 echocardiograms to observe canine-patient interactions and determine best practices for inclusion of dog/handler team into the echocardiogram protocol. Study Phase: 150 subjects ages will be selected from all children ages 1 to 5 years presenting for clinically ordered echocardiograms during the study time period. Subjects will be assigned into one of three groups: 1) Canine assisted therapy only; 2) Canine assisted therapy plus standard distraction techniques; and 3) Standard distraction techniques only. Echocardiography reviewers will be blinded to subject study group and will assign quality and completeness score based on validated criteria. Parental satisfaction will be assessed using validated survey tools. Data analysis and risk/safety issues: All subjects will be assigned a random subject ID, with the only link to PHI stored in a Duke Redcap database. Statistical testing will be performed with the assistance of Tracy Spears (biostatistician in DCRI) who has assisted with development of testing tools. There are no physical risks associated with the echocardiogram portion of the study, and very minimal risks with the therapy dog portion of the study. Please see "Pets at Duke" policy included in study documents. There is a potential loss of confidentiality, although the only link between subject ID and PHI will be stored in a Duke Recap database.

About this trial record page

What this page shows

Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03059407, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.

What this page does not do

No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.

Where the data comes from

Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.

Last refresh

Last update posted Feb 20, 2025 · Synced Sep 1, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.