Independent directory Public ClinicalTrials.gov records United States
ClinicalTrials.gov record
Completed Phase 4 Interventional Accepts healthy volunteers Results available

A Comparison of Eleview Versus Hetastarch as Injectate for EMR

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03350217

Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03350217. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.

ClinicalTrials.gov public records Last synced Sep 2, 2026, 4:47 PM EDT

Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.

Official title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative, Effectiveness and Safety Study of Eleview vs. Hetastarch in Subjects Undergoing Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colonic Lesions Equal to or Larger Than 11mm

Brief summary

Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.

EMR is a technique used for the removal of flat or sessile neoplasms confined to the superficial layers of the GI tract using a snare. Injection-assisted EMR is commonly used during resections of larger flat lesions as it provides submucosal lift of polyps, adenomas, other gastrointestinal mucosal lesions or early-stage cancers prior to EMR. This has been found to minimize mechanical or electrocautery damage to the deep layers of the gastrointestinal tract wall as the injectate provides a "safety cushion" as such between the area to be removed and healthy mucosal tissue. Several solutions are used today for injecting lesions including saline, hyaluronic acid, and hydroxyethyl starch (Hetastarch). Saline solution has been found to dissipate within minutes, which may result in a lower quality lesion lift. Hyaluronic acid provides a longer lift, but is expensive and is not readily available in the U.S. A new injectate known as Eleview has been developed for use in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures and recently approved by the FDA. This injectate boasts a cushion of excellent height and duration through the use of an oil-in-water emulsion. However, the initial cost of this material is quite high ($80 per 10 ml). Hetastarch, which is the current injectate used by Dr Rex, is a safe and considerably inexpensive solution that provides prolonged submucosal elevation and lowers procedure times. Our study will aim to compare Eleview to Hetastarch in the hopes of finding the ideal submucosal injectate. This trial will focus on polyps of size ≥11 mm removed by snare EMR technique. Patients with lesions deemed not suitable for EMR due to features suggestive of sub-mucosal invasion will not be included.

Study identification

NCT ID
NCT03350217
Recruitment status
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Other
Enrollment
160 participants

Conditions and interventions

Eligibility (public fields only)

Age range
18 Years and older
Sex
All
Healthy volunteers
Accepts healthy volunteers

This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Study timeline

Start date
Oct 8, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 6, 2019
Completion
Jan 6, 2019
Last update posted
Dec 16, 2019

2017 – 2019

United States locations

U.S. sites
1
U.S. states
1
U.S. cities
1
Facility City State ZIP Site status
Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana 46202

Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.

About this trial record page

What this page shows
Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03350217, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
What this page does not do
No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
Where the data comes from
Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
Last refresh
Last update posted Dec 16, 2019 · Synced Sep 2, 2026

Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.

Open the official record

The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT03350217 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View official ClinicalTrials.gov record →