Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03711916. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Pilot Study: Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery for Mastectomy Breast Flap Creation With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT03711916
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 20 participants
Conditions and interventions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 75 Years
- Sex
- Female
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Mar 16, 2017
- Primary completion
- Oct 23, 2018
- Completion
- Dec 2, 2018
- Last update posted
- Jun 17, 2019
2017 – 2018
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 2
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bayview Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | — |
| Johns Hopkins Hospital Outpatient Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03711916, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Jun 17, 2019 · Synced Sep 6, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT03711916 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.