Capnogram and Fluid Responsiveness
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03788707. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Performance of CO2 Changes to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Volunteers
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is of paramount importance. It can help define an adequate fluid balance. Overzealous fluid administration is poorly tolerated and has been associated with poor outcomes but so has insufficient administration. Currently available predictors of fluid responsiveness rely on invasive monitors and require patients to be on mechanical ventilation. It is thus important to develop non invasive novel methods to assess fluid responsiveness to provide an accurate management for a favorable outcome. We propose a readily available non-invasive method that relies on improvement of the ventilation perfusion mismatch as recorded by end tidal CO2. Ventilation of physiologic dead space is part of a spectrum of mismatch between ventilation and perfusion of the lungs. The extent of pulmonary dead space varies depending on factors affecting pulmonary perfusion (e.g. pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure) and alveolar pressure (e.g. positive pressure ventilation). Compromised pulmonary capillary perfusion can lead to ventilation-perfusion mismatch in a patient with clear conductive airway and adequate alveolar oxygen pressure. Alveolar dead space results in decreased CO2 exchange that translates into lower levels of expired CO2. Stroke volume of the right ventricle is a major determinant of the pulmonary capillary perfusion. Right ventricular cardiac output can be increased by passive lower limb elevation maneuver, which ultimately results in improvement of the ventilation to perfusion ratio. This effect leads to a higher participation of perfused (and ventilated) alveolar units in gas exchange and narrowing of the gradient between arterial and expired CO2 concentration. Performing a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver leads to stroke volume enhancement in both healthy patients and in those experiencing hemodynamic instability. Responsiveness to PLR can be assessed by different methods including echocardiography and pulse pressure variation. Left ventricular cardiac output (LVCO) can be easily measured by transthoracic echo and be used as a surrogate of right ventricular preload changes. LVCO can thus be used to assess the fluid responsiveness of PLR and the effects of on end tidal CO2 that ensue. We propose this study to test the hypothesis that expired CO2 is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness after performance of the PLR maneuver, based on the assumption that increasing right ventricular output causes a reduction of the ventilation to perfusion ratio, leading to increased levels of expired CO2. T
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT03788707
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- Not listed
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepts healthy volunteers
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Primary completion
- Nov 30, 2021
- Completion
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last update posted
- Jul 27, 2021
2019 – 2021
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augusta University | Augusta | Georgia | 30912 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03788707, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Jul 27, 2021 · Synced Sep 6, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT03788707 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.