Comparing Heel Stick Glucoses in Neonates
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04811612. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Comparison of Warmed and Un-warmed Heel Stick Capillary Blood Glucose Samples in Neonates
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Newborn babies can develop low blood sugar (glucose) which can lead to brain injury and poor developmental outcomes. Therefore, it is important to accurately measure the blood glucose in babies. One way to measure the blood glucose is to test blood from the baby's heel with a bedside device called a point of care glucometer. This method is very common and easy; however, multiple factors can lead to an inaccurate reading. A false low reading may require additional blood testing and admission to the NICU. A false high reading could result in the medical provider missing the diagnosis of low blood glucose. Our team wants to know if there is a difference between blood glucose measurements taken from warmed and un-warmed heels of infants. Blood flow farther away from the heart, such as in the feet and heels, may be less than the rest of the body, and might move more slowly. This could cause the glucose level to be lower in the feet and heels. Therefore, sampling blood from an un-warmed heel may result in a falsely low glucose reading. There is some research that suggests warming the heel increases blood flow to the area; however, only one study that we know of has evaluated differences in blood glucose readings from warmed and un-warmed heels. They found significantly higher blood glucose readings from warmed heels compared to un-warmed heels in 57 babies. However, these babies were part of a larger study comparing different diets on blood glucose levels, and the heels were warmed using warm water which is no longer a current practice. The goal of this study is to compare the capillary blood glucose levels from warmed and un-warmed heels in about 100 infants who are breast and/or formula fed using the current practice of warming heels with gel heat packs. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between capillary blood glucose levels sampled from an infants warmed and un-warmed heel. The alternative hypothesis is that capillary blood glucose levels sampled from warmed heels will be higher than those samples from un-warmed heels.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT04811612
- Recruitment status
- Not listed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 100 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 0 Hours to 48 Hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepts healthy volunteers
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Apr 30, 2021
- Primary completion
- Sep 30, 2021
- Completion
- Sep 30, 2021
- Last update posted
- Mar 22, 2021
2021
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond Children's Medical Center | Tucson | Arizona | 85719 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04811612, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Mar 22, 2021 · Synced Sep 10, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT04811612 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.