Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Obstructed Defecation Surgery
Open the official record
This page only displays public information reproduced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05747027. It adds no medical advice, opinions, or eligibility judgments. The official record remains the source of truth for eligibility criteria, enrollment, and contact information.
All trial information on this site comes from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API (clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2), run by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. We only display that public information; we do not add opinions, endorsements, or any other intent. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transvaginal Rectopexy and Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Obstructed Defecation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PROD Trial)
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Obstructive defecatory syndrome (ODS) or inability to completely empty bowel is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with bowel movement. This is a common condition with estimated incidence of 15-20% in the adult female population. Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy is an established surgical technique aimed at restoring rectal support in women with this condition. It is the most common surgery used nowadays to treat ODS. Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy, is an innovative procedure which has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stool entrapment. Currently it is unknown whether one of the procedures mentioned is superior to the other regarding surgical outcomes and patient experience. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of these two procedures considering their efficacy to improve symptoms. During the study, participants will be randomized to undergo one of two procedures for treatment of inability to completely empty their bowel and/or rectal prolapse: 1) laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy; 2) transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy. Following the procedure, participants will be asked to return to the office for a follow-up visit 2-weeks, 2-, 12- and 24-months after the surgery. During each follow-up visit participants will undergo symptom evaluation, pelvic exam and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound to evaluate surgical success.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT05747027
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 15 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Interventions
- Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy Procedure
- Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy Procedure
Procedure
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 80 Years
- Sex
- Female
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- May 16, 2024 (Actual)
- Primary completion
- May 30, 2025 (Actual)
- Completion
- May 30, 2025 (Actual)
- Last update posted
- Jul 15, 2025
2024 – 2025
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 2
- U.S. states
- 2
- U.S. cities
- 2
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endeavor Health | Skokie | Illinois | 60076 | — |
| Weill Cornell Medicine | New York | New York | 10065 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05747027, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted Jul 15, 2025 · Synced Nov 13, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.