Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed-field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in High Versus Low-volume Ablation Centers (SAFFICIENT)
Public ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06488820. Field values are reproduced from the official study page; the official ClinicalTrials.gov record remains the source of truth for eligibility, enrollment, and contact information.
Data is sourced from official ClinicalTrials.gov public API records. Always review the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for the latest information.
Official title
Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed-field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in High Versus Low-volume Ablation Centers
Brief summary
Reproduced verbatim from the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Not medical advice.
Catheter ablation using radiofrequency (RF) energy has been widely adopted for management of atrial fibrillation (AF) for the past several years. However, heterogeneity of outcomes and complication rates are still reported that have been partly attributed to operator's experience and center's procedure volume (1). In a meta-analysis of 14 studies, both hospital volume of ≥50 and ≥100 procedures per year were associated with significantly lower complication rate compared to \<50/year (2). Pulse-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for AF management that has demonstrated tremendous potential in terms of preferential tissue ablation with no damage to the adjacent organs. In the MANIFEST-PF survey, 24 European centers participated that had a mean of 704 ablations per year with 73.3 (range 7-291) PFA ablations annually (3). No post-PFA esophageal complications, PV stenosis or persistent phrenic nerve injury were reported. There appeared to be a trend toward fewer complications with center experience, particularly for pericardial tamponade (3). However, the impact of number of PFA performed on procedure-success and safety has not been evaluated in the US. This multicenter prospective study is designed to compare the incidence of adverse event (AE) and long-term procedural success of pulse-field ablation for AF in low volume (\<100/year) vs. high volume (≥100/year) centers.
Study identification
- NCT ID
- NCT06488820
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- Not listed
- Enrollment
- 75 participants
Conditions and interventions
Conditions
Eligibility (public fields only)
- Age range
- 18 Years to 85 Years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Healthy volunteers not accepted
This page does not interpret eligibility. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Study timeline
- Start date
- Aug 28, 2024
- Primary completion
- Apr 3, 2025
- Completion
- Apr 3, 2025
- Last update posted
- May 27, 2025
2024 – 2025
United States locations
- U.S. sites
- 1
- U.S. states
- 1
- U.S. cities
- 1
| Facility | City | State | ZIP | Site status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia | Austin | Texas | 78705 | — |
Site contact phone numbers, emails, and investigator names are intentionally not displayed here. Open the official ClinicalTrials.gov record for site contact information.
About this trial record page
- What this page shows
- Public field values for ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06488820, including study identification, conditions, interventions, eligibility (age, sex, healthy volunteer), timeline, and U.S. site list.
- What this page does not do
- No medical advice, eligibility judgments, treatment recommendations, study quality scoring, or AI-generated medical summaries. No site contact phone numbers, emails, or investigator names.
- Where the data comes from
- Sourced from the official ClinicalTrials.gov public API. The official record is the source of truth.
- Last refresh
- Last update posted May 27, 2025 · Synced Sep 6, 2026
Related: full search, browse by condition, browse by drug or therapy, browse by sponsor, browse by U.S. city.
Open the official record
The complete protocol, eligibility criteria, and contact information for NCT06488820 live on ClinicalTrials.gov.